top of page
Search
Writer's pictureWilliam Loeb

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy: TheDOGE Plan to Reform Government

Reprint of WSJ Opinion written by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy Following the Supreme Court’s guidance, we’ll reverse a decades long

executive power grab. Nov. 20, 2024

Our nation was founded on the basic idea that the people we elect run

the government. That isn’t how America functions today. Most legal

edicts aren’t laws enacted by Congress but “rules and regulations”

promulgated by unelected bureaucrats—tens of thousands of them each

year. Most government enforcement decisions and discretionary

expenditures aren’t made by the democratically elected president or

even his political appointees but by millions of unelected, unappointed

civil servants within government agencies who view themselves as

immune from firing thanks to civil-service protections.

This is antidemocratic and antithetical to the Founders’ vision. It

imposes massive direct and indirect costs on taxpayers. Thankfully, we

have a historic opportunity to solve the problem. On Nov. 5, voters

decisively elected Donald Trump with a mandate for sweeping change,

and they deserve to get it.

President Trump has asked the two of us to lead a newly formed

Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, to cut the federal

government down to size. The entrenched and ever-growing

bureaucracy represents an existential threat to our republic, and

politicians have abetted it for too long. That’s why we’re doing things

differently. We are entrepreneurs, not politicians. We will serve as

outside volunteers, not federal officials or employees. Unlike

government commissions or advisory committees, we won’t just write

reports or cut ribbons. We’ll cut costs.


We are assisting the Trump transition team to identify and hire a lean

team of small-government crusaders, including some of the sharpest

technical and legal minds in America. This team will work in the new

administration closely with the White House Office of Management and

Budget. The two of us will advise DOGE at every step to pursue three

major kinds of reform: regulatory rescissions, administrative

reductions and cost savings. We will focus particularly on driving

change through executive action based on existing legislation rather

than by passing new laws. Our North Star for reform will be the U.S.

Constitution, with a focus on two critical Supreme Court rulings issued

during President Biden’s tenure.


In West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency (2022), the

justices held that agencies can’t impose regulations dealing with major

economic or policy questions unless Congress specifically authorizes

them to do so. In Loper Bright v. Raimondo (2024), the court overturned

the Chevron doctrine and held that federal courts should no longer

defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of the law or their own

rulemaking authority. Together, these cases suggest that a plethora of

current federal regulations exceed the authority Congress has granted

under the law.


DOGE will work with legal experts embedded in government agencies,

aided by advanced technology, to apply these rulings to federal

regulations enacted by such agencies. DOGE will present this list of

regulations to President Trump, who can, by executive action,

immediately pause the enforcement of those regulations and initiate

the process for review and rescission. This would liberate individuals

and businesses from illicit regulations never passed by Congress and

stimulate the U.S. economy.


When the president nullifies thousands of such regulations, critics will

allege executive overreach. In fact, it will be correcting the executive

overreach of thousands of regulations promulgated by administrative

fiat that were never authorized by Congress. The president owes

lawmaking deference to Congress, not to bureaucrats deep within

federal agencies. The use of executive orders to substitute for

lawmaking by adding burdensome new rules is a constitutional affront,

but the use of executive orders to roll back regulations that wrongly

bypassed Congress is legitimate and necessary to comply with the

Supreme Court’s recent mandates. And after those regulations are fully

rescinded, a future president couldn’t simply flip the switch and revive

them but would instead have to ask Congress to do so.


A drastic reduction in federal regulations provides sound industrial

logic for mass head-count reductions across the federal bureaucracy.

DOGE intends to work with embedded appointees in agencies to

identify the minimum number of employees required at an agency for it

to perform its constitutionally permissible and statutorily mandated

functions. The number of federal employees to cut should be at least

proportionate to the number of federal regulations that are nullified:

Not only are fewer employees required to enforce fewer regulations, but

the agency would produce fewer regulations once its scope of authority

is properly limited. Employees whose positions are eliminated deserve

to be treated with respect, and DOGE’s goal is to help support their

transition into the private sector. The president can use existing laws to

give them incentives for early retirement and to make voluntary

severance payments to facilitate a graceful exit.


Conventional wisdom holds that statutory civil-service protections stop

the president or even his political appointees from firing federal

workers. The purpose of these protections is to protect employees from

political retaliation. But the statute allows for “reductions in force” that

don’t target specific employees. The statute further empowers the

president to “prescribe rules governing the competitive service.” That

power is broad. Previous presidents have used it to amend the civil

service rules by executive order, and the Supreme Court has held—in

Franklin v. Massachusetts (1992) and Collins v. Yellen (2021) that they

weren’t constrained by the Administrative Procedures Act when they

did so. With this authority, Mr. Trump can implement any number of

“rules governing the competitive service” that would curtail

administrative overgrowth, from large-scale firings to relocation of

federal agencies out of the Washington area. Requiring federal

employees to come to the office five days a week would result in a wave

of voluntary terminations that we welcome: If federal employees don’t

want to show up, American taxpayers shouldn’t pay them for the Covid-

era privilege of staying home.


Finally, we are focused on delivering cost savings for taxpayers.

Skeptics question how much federal spending DOGE can tame through

executive action alone. They point to the 1974 Impoundment Control

Act, which stops the president from ceasing expenditures authorized by

Congress. Mr. Trump has previously suggested this statute is

unconstitutional, and we believe the current Supreme Court would

likely side with him on this question. But even without relying on that

view, DOGE will help end federal overspending by taking aim at the

$500 billion plus in annual federal expenditures that are unauthorized

by Congress or being used in ways that Congress never intended, from

$535 million a year to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and $1.5

billion for grants to international organizations to nearly $300 million

to progressive groups like Planned Parenthood.


The federal government’s procurement process is also badly broken.

Many federal contracts have gone unexamined for years. Large-scale

audits conducted during a temporary suspension of payments would

yield significant savings. The Pentagon recently failed its seventh

consecutive audit, suggesting that the agency’s leadership has little

idea how its annual budget of more than $800 billion is spent. Critics

claim that we can’t meaningfully close the federal deficit without taking

aim at entitlement programs like Medicare and Medicaid, which require

Congress to shrink. But this deflects attention from the sheer

magnitude of waste, fraud and abuse that nearly all taxpayers wish to

end—and that DOGE aims to address by identifying pinpoint executive

actions that would result in immediate savings for taxpayers.


With a decisive electoral mandate and a 6-3 conservative majority on

the Supreme Court, DOGE has a historic opportunity for structural

reductions in the federal government. We are prepared for the

onslaught from entrenched interests in Washington. We expect to

prevail. Now is the moment for decisive action. Our top goal for DOGE is

to eliminate the need for its existence by July 4, 2026—the expiration

date we have set for our project. There is no better birthday gift to our

nation on its 250th anniversary than to deliver a federal government

that would make our Founders proud.

Mr. Musk is CEO of SpaceX and Tesla. Mr. Ramaswamy, a businessman,

is author, most recently, of “Truths: The Future of America First” and

was a candidate for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.

President-elect Trump has named them co-heads of the Department of

Government Efficiency

10 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page